Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0379819940110020018
Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion
1994 Volume.11 No. 2 p.18 ~ p.32
A Case-Control Study of Effectiveness of Injury Prevention Education on Elementary School Students
°­Èñ¼÷
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of injury prevention education on elementary school students. We are selected two elementary school in Tejeon, one was intervention school, the other was control school. Surveys were completed before the begining of the interventions in February in 1994 and again after their completion in July 1994. Intervention group was 284 students in pre?test and 218 students in post-test. And control group was 253 students in pre?test and 208 students in post-test. The results of this study was followed.

1. In the general characteristics of subjects studied, sex, mother education, father education, economic status, number of household, and traffic environment were not significant difference between intervention and control group(p>0.05).

2. The contents of injury prevention education that subjects wished to learn, were not significant difference between intervention and control group(p>0.05). Also the mothods of that were sig¡©nificant difference between intervention and control group in pre-test(p<0.05) but not in post-test(p> 0.05).

3. Education in knowledge, attitude and practice of injury prevention was slightly effectiveness. Change in attitude of injury prevention was higher than in knowledge and attitude of that we guess that they require a lot of education in the pedestrian prevention.

4. Reative risk between intervention and control group in injury incidence was 1.53 in hospital-care students, and 1.43 in home-care children. Also relative risk of total injury incidence was 1. 38, therefore we knew that injury incidence after education was reduced.

5. In the analysis of injury causes, pedestrain injury was remarkably reduced at hospital - care students in two group. At home-care students, two groups were high proportion in play injury.

6. In the analysis of injury places, intervention group was high proportion at near-the house in pre-test(35.4%) and at school in post-test(36.4%). And control group was high at inside-the house in pre-test(31.5%) and at near?the house in post-test(28.2%).
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information